Philosophy of Mind

On misunderstanding Dennett

Dennett’s new book From Bacteria to Bach and Back Again is producing some headlines these days. Some of them are rather positive but there are actually the headlines (again) that Dennett says consciousness does not exist. Take for example this video of Massimo Pigliucci and Dan Kaufman. They have a great talk about the underappreciated philosophy of Wilfrid Sellars. In the discussion of the distinction between the manifest image and the scientific image they are also talking about Dennett’s theory of consciousness.

They think Dennett says that consciousness does not exist. But I think they are just wrong. True, Dennett says that consciousness is like an “user-illusion”. But, first of all, also illusions exist and have effects on us.

They cite the analogy of a desktop PC and it’s user interface. Take the folders you see on your desktop. You put files in it and you can look inside them and so on. But if you look into your computer you won’t find anything that corresponds to the folder, you cannot look into anything that is like a folder and so on. The graphical interface is an useful illusion. Kaufman and Pigliucci agree on this.

On the other hand, they say, consciousness is nothing like that. To say that consciousness is an illusion is like ignoring the data. We know that there is consciousness and cannot just say it does not exist. But Dennett says nothing like that. The user interface also exists but some of its properties are just useful illusions. The same goes for consciousness Dennett’s view, I think. There is consciousness, it is a real phenomenon. I cannot see anywhere that Dennett denies this. But he says, some of the properties we think consciousness has — like infallibility of first person access etc. — especially those that let philosophers think consciousness cannot be a natural phenomenon, are just illusions.

So what does Dennett? He takes our philosophical thoughts about consciousness that come from the manifest image and hinder us in achieving a scientific understanding of the mind and explains how we came to these beliefs and how we can explain them, why they are so compelling. He does not try to eliminate the manifest image of the mind or something like that. He tries to build bridges from the manifest to the scientific image of the mind and in so doing laying some foundations for cognitive science.


The Science of Consciousness and Non-phyiscalist views of consciousness

I found two playlists of some recent conferences on consciousness. One is the The Science of Consciousness Conference 2016. There are some hours of presentations and panels on the state of the art theories of consciousness. You can see a good deal of empirical data and philosophical arguments. It is always interesting for me to see how scientists tackle such problems as consciousness, which seemed to be philosophical problems. I just watched the first video about the global workspace theory of consciousness and I must say that strengthens my conviction that we will have someday a totally materialist theory of consciousness.

The second one is the playlist of the Non-phisicalist Views of Consciousness Conference at Cambridge. Personally I think there is no way of a non-physicalist theory of anything (even so, it does not have to be reductive phsyicalism), it is interesting to see some arguments that a naturalist in the philosophy of mind has to face.

Cognitive Science Movie Index

Here I found a great site for everyone that is interested in good movies and Cognitive Science or philosophy of mind. This sites collects movies that are related to subjects of cognitive science. Of cause there are some classics like Inception, Bladerunner or Clockwork Orange. But there are also some exotic movies like the anime Akira that is well known in the anime community for its philosophical ingredients. Everyone can submitted some suggestions for the list.brain-954822_960_720

So wether you search some good examples for your next paper or seminar or you just want to watch a good movie with some scientific or philosophical implications this list is for you!

Cognitive Sciencce Movie Index

Andy Clark guest blogging about Surfing Uncertainty

Andy Clark is guest blogging at Philosophy of Brains Blog. He 51zmrn5hhl-_sx329_bo1204203200_is just now publishing his new book “Surfing Uncertainty: Prediction, Action, and the Embodied Mind”. Andy Clark is one of the most contempory adherents to the theory of the embodied mind. His thesis in the first blog entry is that the mind is a “multi-level prediction machinery”. The mind is perfoming high-level predictions onto a lower level of stimulations. That means that our knowledge plays an essential role for the workings of the mind. Especially prediction errors are seen to be important for tasks like learning. Sounds like a very interesting book and theory.